Hi All, smiles :
Just wetting my taste bud of "Rainbow Tests" in The Journey of Infinity Mile - in the words of James Burk - About "Yesterday, Tomorrow and You" then "several choices, but in the end it only makes sense to continue on " !!!
http://www.palmersguide.com/jamesburke/billotto_con1.html
Here are some :
- "The Human Growth Continuum" by Hugh & Amalia Kaye Martin : The world is made up of two kinds of people – the few who grow, and the many who don’t
http://www.integralworld.net/?news.html
- "ARRAYS OF LIGHT - Ken Wilber's Tables of Correspondence " by Hugh and Kaye Martin : Ken Wilber's Tables represent the distilled essence of his work. In them, he delineates the entire sequence of development, applicable to every process of human growth. Then, he demonstrates plausibly how dozens of authorities, in broadly diverse fields, all define and elucidate some aspect of that great sequence. Where else does he summarize his whole system of human development so tangibly, so comprehensively, so succinctly, so convincingly?
http://www.integralworld.net/?news.html
- "Derrida and NonDuality - On the Possible Shortcomings of Nondual Spirituality " by Gregory Desilet : Ken Wilber's interest in postmodern theory derives in part from his thoroughness in attending to all the philosophical and spiritual threads historically influential in cultures around the world but also in good part from the fact that postmodernism presents a penetrating and relentless critique of metaphysical tradition. Since this metaphysical tradition has been mightily influenced by spiritual traditions, religion has been no less a target of postmodern critique than philosophy. And among philosophers placed in the postmodern bin, Jacques Derrida emerges as probably the most rigorous, original, prolific, and broadly influential theorist (Not sure what it is - dedicated to livingegg)
http://www.integralworld.net/?news.html
- " INTEGRAL WITH A TWIST INTEGRAL PSYCHOLOGY VS. HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY " by Elliot Benjamin : In one of my recent articles, “Wilber Vs. Schneider: Transpersonal Vs. Existential” [1], I described the debate between transpersonal and existential psychology in the late 1980s, which has continued in full force into the first decade of the 21st century. Closely related to existential psychology is humanistic psychology, largely based upon the idealistic and life affirming visions of uplifting human growth potential initially described by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow in the 1950s and 1960s [2]. However, it can be argued that contemporary humanistic psychology incorporates and assimilates both existential and transpersonal psychology, as well as seemingly much further removed fields of psychology such as psychodynamic, cognitive, and behavior psychology (tumbled over jess's existential word, smile)
http://www.integralworld.net/?news.html
- " Collaborative Knowledge Building and Integral Theory On Perspectives, Uncertainty, and Mutual Regard " by Tom Murray : With the founding of the Integral Institute and its satellite organizations, integral theory moves further from "the world of Ken Wilber" and progressively toward a community knowledge building endeavor. The most recent version of Wilber's AQAL theory (phase "Wilber-V") emphasizes multiple perspectives and multiple knowledge building methodologies. This points to an important and, I think, necessary turn in the evolution of integral theory, which heretofore has primarily focused on the task of articulating models, "orienting generalizations," or meta-models describing "what is" (or what seems to be the case), toward an exploration and articulation of method itself—"how we (can) know what is." This turn constitutes a greater emphasis on epistemology vs. ontology—i.e. on the nature of knowledge vs. the nature of "reality" (though integral theory has always concerned itself with both). - rather dry to digest but if you don't mind
http://www.integralworld.net/?news.html
Cheers